Galactinus Photophotography comments
About this Entry
Posted by: galactinus

Visit galactinus's Xanga Site

Original: 12/11/2005 11:32 AM
Views: 82
Comments: 0
eProps: 0

Read Comments
Post a Comment
Back to Your Xanga Site



Sunday, December 11, 2005

 Well, it seems to me it is time to start writing, i.e. to start writing about my philosophy concerning photography. These days, I'm a kind of a retro, I'm doing pinhole photography, I'm using various old cameras and I'm using old lenses on a digital SLR body. I do not use auto-exposure let alone auto-focus. All this started when I noticed that quite many if not most people doing photography harboured the notion that one had to have the latest and greatest auto-focus zoom lens in order to take good photos. What a silly misconception. It is quite possible to take good photos even without a lens, a good photo doesn't necessarily need to be sharp, lens flare isn't always an evil to be avoided at all costs, a hundred years old camera or lens can produce photos with a great visual  or emotional impact despite being technically lacking.

The following photo has been taken with a ninety years old lens taken from the cheapest pocket camera of that era:

It perhaps isn't a great photo, but the latest and greatest lens would have precious little to add - and would probably detract something essential from the mood. (Click the pic to see a larger version.)

The following photo was taken completely without a lens, with a pinhole camera:

It would be very difficult or quite impossible to take this photo with a normal camera as the nearest 31mm high chess piece is only about 85mm from the camera. (Click the pic to see a larger version.)

Every day, on many forums, people are asking which lens they ought to use for this or that in order to guarantee good results. Well, a technically perfect photo isn't necessarily a good photo, and a superior lens doesn't transform the owner into a good photographer - there is no magic bullet. In a way it is quite liberating to use a "bad" lens as one then cannot blame the lens for bad photos and one need not be disappointed if a photo isn't technically quite as perfect as expected from an expensive "perfect" lens. I've got a number of very good lenses, but I mostly use my "bad" lenses because then I'm free to concentrate on the essence, on the pictorial aspects of photography.
 Posted 12/11/2005 11:32 AM - 82 Views - 0 eProps - 0 comments

Give eProps or Post a Comment

Choose Identity
(?)
 
Give eProps (?)
Post a Comment
Add Link | Preview HTML comment help 
Profile Pic:
Default  |  Choose »  (?)



Back to galactinus's Xanga Site!
Note: your comment will appear in galactinus's local time zone:
GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)